# Study 000D Submission Guidance

## Best Fit

This study is best positioned as:

- a biomechanics interpretation paper
- a wearable-data interpretation paper
- a self-research / quantified-self science paper
- a constrained-movement adaptation paper

## Strongest framing

The strongest framing is:

`This longitudinal study program suggests that successful adaptation in an altered-mechanics system may depend more on selective expression than on broad normalization.`

## What it can claim

- the corrected program aligns more strongly with selective expression than with broad normalization
- the later system narrowed into more stabilized running expression
- cadence appears to have remained the more accessible adaptation lever
- stride expression remained more constrained under higher-demand probes
- internal burden improved only partially

## What it should not claim

- universal biomechanics law
- full clinical mechanism
- treatment guidance
- proof of what a normative comparison system would do

## Best use in outreach

This is a good package to send after `000AB` and `000C`, or alongside them if someone asks:

- what is the big scientific idea?
- what is the strongest model-level conclusion?

In that setting, `000D` is the cleanest answer.