# Study 000H Audit

## Structural Audit

This package is structurally sound.

It includes:

- candidate-factor outputs
- support-case table
- figures
- manuscript/report set
- build script
- manifest

## Scientific Audit

Study `000H` asks:

`What envelope-support factors seem to determine whether a cadence-protected outside-surface run becomes high-burden or low-burden?`

The answer is:

`High local running embedding and stabilized-context continuity are the strongest supported candidates.`

Why:

- they separate the April boundary probe from the October cluster much more strongly than total recent activity volume
- the cadence-protected mechanical pattern stayed similar while burden diverged
- bout length looks relevant, but less isolated than embedding

## Boundaries

- This remains an observational mechanism study.
- It does not prove a single exclusive support factor.
- It does not fully resolve the relative weight of embedding versus bout length when they diverge.
- It does provide the strongest current answer to the envelope-support question created by `000G`.